LUSI TETAP MENJADI PERHATIAN DUNIA, PUBLIKASI EDISI KHUSUS MPG 2009 DIBANDINGKAN 2017

EVOLUSI PERUBAHAN PARADIGMA PEMAHAMAN LUSI DARI MUD VOLCANO KONVENSIONAL HASIL SEDIMENTASI VULKANISME (MPG 2009), MENJADI LUSI SEBAGAI INDUK SEDIMEN SISTEM HIDROTERMAL YANG BARU LAHIR BERHUBUNGAN DENGAN GUNUNG MAGMATIK (MPG 2017).

BLOG Hardiprasetyolusi edisi LUSI PADA KANCAH DI MEDIA ILMIAH INTERNASIONAL, BAIK PUBLIKASI MAUPUN PRESENTASI, SECARA KHUSUS MEMBANDINGKAN PUBLIKASI EDISI KHUSUS DI MARINE PETROLEUM GEOLOGY (MPG 2009) DENGAN EDISI KHUSUS MPG 2017.

Agar keberadaan informasi Lusi yang telah disajikan pada forum profesional dan Ilmiah dapat dioptimalkan di Indonesia, sehingga sesuai misi LUSI LIBRARY:KNOWLEDGE MANAGMENT telah ditelusuri dari sumber tangan pertama yaitu dari Situs Website Andriano Mazzini, dalam dua aspek:

  1. Berita (NEWS) mengikuti proses, dan evolusi dikembangkannya konsep sampai dipublikasikan pada beberapa media profesional Internasional;
  2. Dari daftar publikasi terutama runtunan makalah Edisi Khusus MPG 2009 dan MPG 2017, dimana sebagian dilengkapi dengan fasilitas Download.

Hampir semua makalah utama terkait LUSI baik di MPG 2009 dan MPG 2017 telah ditinjau dalam bahasa Indonesia dan ditempatkan pada LUSI LIBRARY, Blogger, dan WordPresscome.

 LUSI LIBRARY FILE EBOOK LUSI
http://00ahli-lusi-2015.blogspot.co.id/2015/02/mazzini-2009-special-issue-mud.html

lulib

Pertama kalinya bisa menjelajah Zona Nirwana Turis, pasca terjadinya even perulangan banjir bandang lumpur pekat berskala regional, saya sebut sebagai even TNI 5 Oktober 2014.

MAZZINI 2009, SPECIAL ISSUE Mud Volcanism: Processes and Implications,

LINK: 

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/02648172/26/9

Marine and Petroleum Geology, Volume 26, Issue 9, Pages 1677-1896 (Nov. 2009)
Cover image Marine and Petroleum Geology

Mud Volcanism: Processes and Implications

Edited by Adriano Mazzini

Editorial
1677 Mud volcanism: Processes and implications
A. Mazzini

Onshore mud volcanism
1681 Cyclic activity of mud volcanoes: Evidences from Trinidad (SE Caribbean)
E. Deville and S.-H. Guerlais
1692 Evidence of subsurface anaerobic biodegradation of hydrocarbons and potential secondary methanogenesis in
terrestrial mud volcanoes
G. Etiope, A. Feyzullayev, A.V. Milkov, A. Waseda, K. Mizobe and C.H. Sun
1704 When mud volcanoes sleep: Insight from seep geochemistry at the Dashgil mud volcano, Azerbaijan
A. Mazzini, H. Svensen, S. Planke, I. Guliyev, G.G. Akhmanov, T. Fallik
and D. Banks
1716 In situ cone penetration tests at the active Dashgil mud volcano, Azerbaijan: Evidence for excess fluid pressure,
updoming, and possible future violent eruption
A. Kopf, S. Stegmann, G. Delisle, B. Panahi, C.S. Aliyev and I. Guliyev

The Lusi mud volcano

1724 Modeling study of growth and potential geohazard for LUSI mud volcano: East Java, Indonesia
B.P. Istadi, G.H. Pramono, P. Sumintadireja and S. Alam
1740 Subsidence associated with the LUSI mud eruption, East Java, investigated by SAR interferometry
Y. Fukushima, J. Mori, M. Hashimoto and Y. Kano
1751 Strike-slip faulting as a trigger mechanism for overpressure release through piercement structures. Implications for the
Lusi mud volcano, Indonesia
A. Mazzini, A. Nermoen, M. Krotkiewski, Y. Podladchikov, S. Planke
and H. Svensen
1766 The LUSI mud volcano triggering controversy: Was it caused by drilling?
N. Sawolo, E. Sutriono, B.P. Istadi and A.B. Darmoyo
1785 Earthquake triggering of mud volcanoes
M. Manga, M. Brumm and M.L. Rudolph

Offshore mud volcanism
1799 Vodyanitskii mud volcano, Sorokin trough, Black Sea: Geological characterization and quantification of gas bubble
streams
H. Sahling, G. Bohrmann, Y.G. Artemov, A. Bahr, M. Brüning, S.A. Klapp, I. Klaucke, E. Kozlova, A. Nikolovska,
T. Pape, A. Reitz and K. Wallmann
1812 The thermal structure of the Dvurechenskii mud volcano and its implications for gas hydrate stability and eruption dynamics
T. Feseker, T. Pape, K. Wallmann, S.A. Klapp, F. Schmidt-Schierhorn and G. Bohrmann
1824 Distinct activity phases during the recent geologic history of a Gulf of Mexico mud volcano
I.R. MacDonald and M.B. Peccini
1831 Shallow seep-related seafloor features along the Malta plateau (Sicily channel – Mediterranean Sea): Morphologies and geo-environmental control of their distribution
A. Savini, E. Malinverno, G. Etiope, C. Tessarolo and C. Corselli
1849 Tectonically-driven mud volcanism since the late Pliocene on the Calabrian accretionary prism, central Mediterranean Sea
D. Praeg, S. Ceramicola, R. Barbieri, V. Unnithan and N. Wardell 

Editorial

Mud volcanism: Processes and implications

Pages 1677-1680, A. Mazzini

Mud volcanoes: generalities and proposed mechanisms

Mud volcanoes can be large and long lived geological structures that morphologically resemble magmatic volcanoes. Because of their capricious behaviour and their spectacular morphology and landscapes, mud volcanoes have attracted attention since antiquity.
More recently, mud volcanoes have become the focus of extensive studies for natural science research, including geologists and biologists.
Mud volcanoes can be essentially divided in two groups: those associated with magmatic complexes and those related to petroleum provinces. Their occurrence is broadly distributed throughout the globe in both passive and predominantly active margins, often situated along faults, fault-related folds, and anticline axes. These structures act as preferential pathways for deep fluids to gather and ultimately reach the surface. Mud volcanoes episodically experience violent eruptions of large amounts of gas mixed with water, oil, mud and rock fragments forming the so called ‘‘mud breccia’’.
The periodical eruptions can produce volcano-shaped mountains that can reach kilometres in size.
Detailed studies of mud volcanoes have been conducted for decades (e.g. Jakubov et al., 1971; Higgins and Saunders, 1974; Barber et al., 1986; Brown, 1990; Camerlenghi et al., 1992; Kholodov, 2002; Kopf, 2002). Below I summarize the main findings so far, combined with my own suggested mechanisms (Fig. 1).
The main driving engine of the eruptions is overpressured methane rising from source rocks and hydrocarbon reservoirs at greater depths. Other known overpressure buildup mechanisms that contribute to the brecciation of the deep sedimentary units include for example the dewatering of thick clay-rich sedimentary
units, and geochemical reactions in sedimentary units with high temperature gradients. These fluids overpressured fluids gather along morphological discontinuities and favorable geological structures (e.g. fault planes, anticline axes, preexisting deformations). During this overpressure buildup a dome or diapir-shaped feature of brecciated sedimentary units forms in the subsurface. The rise of the fluids and the growth if this diapir is partly self-sustained by buoyancy and by the constantly increasing volume of fluids at shallower depth. A suggested scenario summarizing the birth of a mud volcano and the eruption mechanisms envisages that when the subsurface overpressure reaches a threshold depth where the overburden weight is exceeded, fracturing and breaching of the uppermost units occur, sometimes facilitated by external factors (e.g. earthquakes).
Brecciated sediments throughout the feeder channel have a reduced cohesion. As breaching of the overburden occurs (berlanjut).

The Lusi mud volcano

Modeling study of growth and potential geohazard for LUSI mud volcano: East Java, Indonesia

Original Research Article, Pages 1724-1739

Bambang P. Istadi, Gatot H. Pramono, Prihadi Sumintadireja, Syamsu Alam

Abstract

The mud volcano known as LUSI first erupted in May 2006 in East Java, Indonesia. The eruption has continued for over two years, and potentially will continue for many years to come, impacting an ever larger area. An obvious and significant question is how extensive the impacted area will become in the coming years. The answer is important for planning scenarios for the relocation of people and infrastructure and for managing the environment and economy. To make such a prediction, an understanding of the geological processes controlling the mud volcanic evolution is needed.

A three-dimensional simulation model was built to predict the area affected by the mudflow over a ten-year period, with a special focus on the period from December 2007 until June 2010. The primary model inputs are the mud debit rate, the rate of subsidence and the topography. The model prediction was validated at the December 2007 time step by comparing the results with satellite images from the same period. The simulation was found to provide a good approximation for the mud overflow and growth. The results indicate that the mudflow tends to spread to the west and particularly to the east and north from the currently inundated area. The model predicts that in June 2010 the peak of the mud volcano will have risen 26 m above the original ground level, and the maximum subsidence will have been −63 m below the original ground level. The dynamic subsurface condition in the area creates geohazard risks, and these are also discussed in this paper.

Subsidence associated with the LUSI mud eruption, East Java, investigated by SAR interferometry

Original Research Article, Pages 1740-1750

Yo Fukushima, Jim Mori, Manabu Hashimoto, Yasuyuki Kano

Abstract

 A mud volcano LUSI initiated its eruption on 29 May 2006, adjacent to a hydrocarbon exploration well in East Java. Ground subsidence in the vicinity of the LUSI eruptive vent was well recorded by a Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) PALSAR onboard the Japanese ALOS satellite. We apply an Interferometric SAR (InSAR) technique on ten PALSAR data scenes, acquired between 19 May 2006 and 21 May 2007, in order to obtain continuous maps of ground displacements around LUSI. Although the displacements in the area closest to the eruptive vent (spatial extension of about 1.5 km) are not detectable because of the erupted mud, all the processed interferograms indicate subsidence in an ellipsoidal area of approximately 4 km (north–south) × 3 km (east–west), centered at the main eruptive vent. In particular, interferograms spanning the first four months until 4 Oct. 2006 and the subsequent 46 days between 4 Oct. 2006 and 19 Nov. 2006 show at least about 70 cm and 80 cm of displacements away from the satellite, respectively. Possible causes of the subsidence, i.e., 1) loading effect of the erupted mud, 2) creation of a cylindrical mud conduit, and 3) pressure decrease and depletion of materials at depth, are investigated. The effects of the first two causes are found to be insufficient to explain the total amount of subsidence observed in the first six months. The third possibility is quantitatively examined using a boundary element approach by modeling the source of deformation as a deflating oblate spheroid. The spheroid is estimated to lie at depths of a few hundred to a thousand meters. The estimated depths are significantly shallower than determined from analyses of erupted mud samples; the difference is explained by presence of significant amount of inelastic deformation including compaction and downward transfer of material.

 

Strike-slip faulting as a trigger mechanism for overpressure release through piercement structures. Implications for the Lusi mud volcano, Indonesia

Original Research Article Pages 1751-1765

A. Mazzini, A. Nermoen, M. Krotkiewski, Y. Podladchikov, S. Planke, H. Svensen

Abstract

Piercement structures such as hydrothermal vent complexes, pockmarks, and mud volcanoes, are found in various geological settings but are often associated with faults or other fluid-focussing features. This article aims to investigate and understand the mechanisms responsible for the formation of piercement structures in sedimentary basins and the role of strike-slip faulting as a triggering mechanism for fluidization. For this purpose four different approaches were combined: fieldwork, analogue experiments, and mathematical modeling for brittle and ductile rheologies. The results of this study may be applied to several geological settings, including the newly formed Lusi mud volcano in Indonesia (Mazzini et al., 2007).

Lusi became active the 29th of May 2006 on the Java Island. Debates on the trigger of the eruption rose immediately. Was Lusi triggered by the reactivation of a fault after a strong earthquake that occurred two days earlier? Or did a neighbouring exploration borehole induce a massive blow-out? Field observations reveal that the Watukosek fault crossing the Lusi mud volcano was reactivated after the 27th of May 2006 earthquake. Ongoing monitoring shows that the frequent seismicity periodically reactivates this fault with synchronous peaks of flow rates from the crater. Our integrated study demonstrates that the critical fluid pressure required to induce sediment deformation and fluidization is dramatically reduced when strike-slip faulting is active. The proposed shear-induced fluidization mechanism explains why piercement structures such as mud volcanoes are often located along fault zones.

Our results support a scenario where the strike-slip movement of the Watukosek fault triggered the Lusi eruption and synchronous seep activity witnessed at other mud volcanoes along the same fault. The possibility that the drilling contributed to trigger the eruption cannot be excluded. However, so far, no univocal data support the drilling hypothesis, and a blow-out scenario can neither explain the dramatic changes that affected the plumbing system of numerous seep systems on Java after the 27-05-2006 earthquake. To date (i.e. April 2008) Lusi is still active.

The LUSI mud volcano triggering controversy: Was it caused by drilling?

Original Research Article, Pages 1766-1784

Nurrochmat Sawolo, Edi Sutriono, Bambang P. Istadi, Agung B. Darmoyo

Abstract

Following the Yogyakarta earthquake on May 27th, 2006, the subsequent eruption of a mud volcano has been closely observed and analyzed by the geological community. The mud volcano, known as LUSI, began erupting near the Banjarpanji-1 exploration well in Sidoarjo, East Java, Indonesia. LUSI offers a unique opportunity to study the genesis and development of a mud volcano.

For the first time, this paper presents all raw and interpreted drilling data, so any interested party can perform their own assessment. Our study suggests that LUSI mud volcano was a naturally occurring mud volcano in an area prone for its mud volcanism. Pressure analysis done on the Banjarpanji well shows that the pressure exerted at the well is lower than the fracture pressure at the last casing shoe, and suggests that the well was intact and did not suffer an underground blowout. This is further supported by evidence and observation made during drilling (such as circulation was done on an open BOP) and subsequent relief wells (Sonan and temperature log runs).

This study offers a different alternative to earlier hypothesis that events at the Banjarpanji well were the trigger for the LUSI mud volcano. More work is needed by the scientific community to study the sequence of events in order to explain and clarify the real trigger of LUSI.

Earthquake triggering of mud volcanoes

Original Research Article, Pages 1785-1798
Michael Manga, Maria Brumm, Maxwell L. Rudolph

Mud volcanoes sometimes erupt within days after nearby earthquakes. The number of such nearly coincident events is larger than would be expected by chance and the eruptions are thus assumed to be triggered by earthquakes. Here we compile observations of the response of mud volcanoes and other geologic systems (earthquakes, volcanoes, liquefaction, ground water, and geysers) to earthquakes. The compilation shows a clear magnitude–distance threshold for triggering, suggesting that these seemingly disparate phenomena may share similar underlying triggering mechanisms. The compilation also shows that pre-existing geysers and already-erupting volcanoes and mud volcanoes are much more sensitive to earthquakes than quiescent systems.

Several changes produced by earthquakes have been proposed as triggering mechanisms, including liquefaction and loss of strength, increased hydraulic permeability or removing hydraulic barriers, and bubble nucleation and growth. We present new measurements of the response of erupted mud samples to oscillatory shear at seismic frequencies and amplitudes, and find that loss of strength occurs at strain amplitudes greater than 10−3. This is much larger than the peak dynamic strains associated with earthquakes that may have triggered eruptions or influenced already-erupting mud volcanoes. Therefore, we do not favor loss of strength as a general triggering mechanism. Mechanisms involving bubbles require significant supersaturation or incompressible mud, and neither condition is likely to be relevant. We analyze the response of the Niikappu group of mud volcanoes in Japan to several earthquakes. We find that this system is insensitive to earthquakes if an eruption has occurred within the previous couple of years, and that static strain magnitudes are very small and not correlated with triggering suggesting that triggering likely results from dynamic strain. Moreover, triggering may be frequency-dependent with longer period seismic waves being more effective at triggering. Available data are insufficient, however, to determine whether triggering characteristics at Niikappu are representative of triggered eruptions in general. Nor can we determine the exact mechanism by which dynamic (long-period) strains induce eruption, but given the apparent failure of all mechanisms except increasing permeability and breaching barriers we favor these. More observations and longer records are needed. In particular, gas measurements and broadband seismic data can be collected remotely and continuously, and provide key information about processes that occur during and immediately after the arrival of seismic waves.

Lusi Lebih dari Sepuluh Tahun: Suatu Tinjauan dari fakta-faktadan studi terdahulu dan ke depan, 2017

Ditinjau oleh Prof.Dr. Hardi Prasetyo

Untuk LUSI LIBRARY: KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT

Makalah Dikontribusikan melalui Jaringan LRN dari Konsorsium LUSI LAB

Slide001Slide002Slide003Slide004

(A) Peta elevasi Pulau Jawa bagian timur, menampilkan Lokasi beberapa gunung lumpur yang dikenal dan gunung api magmatik utama.

Catatan: Arah BT-SB dari pusat semburan kompleks vulkanik Arjunoe Welirang dan distribusi mata air hidrotermal searah dengan sistem sesar Watukosek yang juga mengakomodasi tebing berukkuran besar dan juga gunung-gunung lumpur;

Lokasi-lokasi situs Lusi dan Porong-1 juga diperlihatkan. Pembubungan Porong (Porong-1 Piercement) ditafsirkan sebagai suatu keruntuhan purba dari sistem hidrotermal purba yang sekarang dapat dicitrakan dengan data refleksi seismik (Istadi etal., 2009).

(A)Citra satelit situs Lusi tahun 2016. Perhatikan dinding tanggul pembatas. Warna coklat adalah area pada bagian luar dari aktivitas pusat semburan merupakan zona kering dimana memungkinkan untuk diakses. Zona hampir melingkar di sekitar pusat semburan terdiri dari breksi lumpur cair yang tidak mudah diakses.

Slide011

Model Konseptual: Lusi sistem hidrotermal dalam dari gunung magmatik (Bagian Bawah) Miller dkk., Juni 2017, dimodifikasi oleh Presetyo 2017 (Untuk Lusi Library)

Slide012Slide013Slide014Slide015Slide016

Sevensen 2017: Modelling of gas generation following empacement of an igneous sill below Lusi, Eas Java.

Slide041

Panzera 2017: Lusi hydrothermal structure inferred through ambient vibration

Slide042Slide043Slide044

Mazzini 2017: The geochemistry and origin of the hydrothermal water erupted at the Lusi Indonesia

Slide045Slide046Slide047Slide048

Mauri 2017: Constraints on density changes in the funnel-shape caldera inferred from gravity monitoring of the Lusi eruption

Slide049Slide050Slide051Slide052

Obermann 2017: Seismicity at Lusi and the adjacent volcanic complex, Java, Indonesia

Slide053Slide054Slide055Slide056

Collignon 2017: Modelling fluid flow in clastic eruptions: Aplication to the Lusi mud

Slide064

Mengikuti Evolusi Paradigma Konsepsi Lusi mud volcano, dari Andriano Mazzini, Ketua TIM LUSI LAB Pada Kancah Internasional.

Sumber NEWS 2017: Andriano Mazzini https://folk.uio.no/adrianom/

Kemanfaatan lainnya bisa memperoleh Naskah Asli secara Online, sebagai bagian dari tujuan LUSI LIBRARY KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMANT.

lulib

December 2017: AGU conference, San Francisco. Chairmen of the session:  From hydrothermal systems to mud volcanoes: structure, evolution and monitoring of active and fossile piercements (V012-25911). Presentation of data.

November 2017. New paper from the Lusi Lab project investigating Lusi region with seismic data
Moscariello, A., Do Couto, D., Mondino, F., Booth, J., Lupi, M., and Mazzini, A., 2017, Genesis and evolution of the Watukosek fault system in the Lusi area (East Java): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.09.032. Marine & Petroleum Geology, v. 

November 2017. New paper from the Lusi Lab project investigating Lusi thermal anomalies: 

Di Felice, F., Mazzini, A., Romeo, G., and Di Stefano, G., 2017, Drone high resolution infrared imaging of the Lusi mud eruption: Marine & Petroleum Geology, v. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.10.025.
October 2017. New paper from the Lusi Lab project investigating the the subsurface plumbing system of the Lusi eruption site: 
Fallahi, M., Obermann, A., Lupi, A., Karyono, K., and Mazzini, A., 2017, The Lusi eruption plumbing system revealed by ambient noise tomography: journal of Geophysical Research, v. DOI: 10.1002/2017JB014592.
(READ MORE)

October 2017. New papers from the Lusi Lab project investigating fluids geochemistry:
Sciarra, A., Mazzini, A., Inguaggiato, S., Vita, F., Lupi, A., and Hadi, S., 2017, Radon and carbon gas anomalies along the Watukosek fault system and Lusi mud eruption, Indonesia: Marine & Petroleum Geology, v. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.09.031.

Inguaggiato, S., Mazzini, A., Vita, F., and Sciarra, A., 2017, The Arjuno-Welirang Volcanic Complex and the connected Lusi system: geochemical evidences: Marine & Petroleum Geology, v. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.10.015.

June 2017. New papers from the Lusi Lab project investigating the dynamics of the Lusi eruption site:
Mazzini, A., Scholz, F., Svensen, C., Hensen, C., and Hadi, S., 2017, The geochemistry and origin of the hydrothermal water erupted at Lusi, Indonesia: Marine & Petroleum Geology, v. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.06.018.

Di Stefano, G., Romeo, G., Mazzini, A., Iarocci, A., Hadi, S., and Pelphrey, S., 2017, The Lusi drone: A multidisciplinary tool to access extreme environments: Marine and Petroleum Geology, v. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.07.006.

Svensen, H., Iyer, K., Schmid, D., and Mazzini, A., 2017, Modelling of gas generation following emplacement of an igneous sill below Lusi, east Java, Indonesia: Marine & Petroleum Geology, v. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.07.007.

Mauri, G., Husein, A., Mazzini, A., Karyono, K., Obermann, A., Bertrand, G. L., M., Prasetyo, H., Hadi, S., and Miller, S. A., 2017, Constraints on density changes in the funnel-shaped caldera inferred from gravity monitoring of the Lusi mud eruption: Marine and Petroleum Geology journal, v. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.06.030.

Mauri, G., Husein, A., Mazzini, A., Irawan, D., Sohrabi, R., Hadi, S., Prasetyo, H., and Miller, S. A., 2017, Insights on the structure of Lusi mud edifice from land gravity data: Marine and Petroleum Geology, v. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.05.041.

Miller, S. A., and Mazzini, A., 2017, More than ten years of Lusi: A review of facts, coincidences, and past and future studies: Marine and Petroleum Geology, v. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.06.019.

Collignon, M., Schmid, D. W., Galerne, C., Lupi, M., and Mazzini, A., 2017, Modelling fluid flow in clastic eruptions: Application to the Lusi mud eruption: Marine and Petroleum Geology, v. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.08.011.

Sohrabi, R., Jansen, G., Malvoisin, B., Mazzini, A., and Miller, S. A., 2017, Numerical modeling of the Lusi hydrothermal system: Initial results and future challenges: Marine and Petroleum Geology, v. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.08.012

Panzera, F., D’Amico, S., Lupi, M., Mauri, G., Karyono, K., and Mazzini, A., 2017, Lusi hydrothermal structure inferred through ambient vibration measurements: Marine and Petroleum Geology, v. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.06.017.

Obermann, A., Karyono, K., Diehl, T., Lupi, A., and Mazzini, A., 2017, Seismicity at Lusi and the adjacent volcanic complex, Java, Indonesia: Marine & Petroleum Geology, v. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.07.033.

 March 2017. New manuscript reviewing the phenomenon of mud volcanism:
Mazzini, A., and Etiope, G., 2017, Mud volcanism: An updated review: Earth-Science Reviews, v. 168, p. 81–112. (DOWNLOAD)

April 2017: EGU General Assembly 2017, Vienna, Austria.
Chairman of the session: From hydrothermal systems to mud volcanoes: structure, evolution and monitoring of active and fossile piercements  (GMPV1.4/BG9.68/SSP3.15 ). Presentation of data on 13 abstracts.

December 2016: AGU conference, San Francisco. Presentation of data on: 
Investigating ambient noise recordings at lusi mud volcano (Indonesia) seismic network. Ambient vibration technique to explore mud volcanoes structure

October 2016. New manuscript describing the actyivity of the clastic-dominated Lusi geysering system:

Karyono, K., Obermann, A., Lupi, M., Masturyono, M., Hadi, S., Syafri, I., Abdurrokhim, A., and Mazzini, A., 2016, Lusi, a clastic dominated geysering system in Indonesia recently explored by surface and subsurface observations: Terra Nova, DOI: 10.1111/ter.12239. DOWNLOAD 

April 2016EGU General Assembly 2016, Vienna, Austria.
Chairman of the session:
 Ten years of Lusi eruption – lessons learned about modern and ancient piercement systems (SSP3.16/GMPV8.10). Presentation of data on 21 abstracts.

December 2015: AGU conference, San FranciscoPresentation of data on:

1- The Geothermal System of the Arjuno-Welirang Volcano (East Java, Indonesia)
2- Gas release from the LUSI eruption site: large scale estimates.
3- Combined 2-D Electrical Resistivity and Self Potential Survey to Investigate the Pattern of the Watukosek Fault System Around the Lusi Eruption Site, Indonesia.
4- Bridging Surface and Subsurface Observations of the Pulsating Behavior of Lusi: a New-born Sedimentary Hosted Hydrothermal System in East Java.

May 2015EGU General Assembly 2015, Vienna, Austria.
Chairman of the session: 
Fluid flow and gas hydrates in continental margins (BG7.2/TS5.5)
Presenting on:

1-Magmatic versus sedimentary volcanism: similarities of two different geological phenomena.
2-Gas flux estimates at the LUSI eruption site.
3-The LUSI Seismic Experiment: Deployment of a Seismic Network around LUSI, East Java, Indonesia.

4-Microbial processes and communities in sediment samples along a transect across the Lusi mud volcano, Indonesia. 

NEWS 2014
The sedimenatry hosted geothermal system in central Java: “Tectonic Control of Piercement Structures in Central Java, Indonesia”

EGU 2014, Vienna, Austria April 2014.   Presentation of data on:
1-The LUSI LAB project: a platform for multidisciplinary experimental studies
2- “The Lusi drone: a mutidisciplinary tool to access extreme environments

April 2013. Mazzini, A., Scholtz, F., Hensen, C., Svensen, H., Planke, S., 2013.  The mysterious Lusi eruption: the origin of water and future challenges. European Geological Union, 07–12 April, Vienna, Austria

June 2012. Winner of the ERC-STG-2012 with the project: LUSI LAB
Lusi: a unique natural laboratory for multidisciplinary studies of focussed fluid flow in sedimentary basins”

.January 2012. New manuscripts describing the hydrothermal scenario of the Lusi eruption (Indonesia) and its connection with the neighbouring Arjuno-Welirang volcanic complex: 
Mazzini, A., Etiope, G., and Svensen, H., 2012, A new hydrothermal scenario for the 2006 Lusi eruption, Indonesia. Insights from gas geochemistry: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 317-318, no. 0, p. 305-318.

May 2011. Humanitus Lusi symposium: 40 years & beyond. Presentation of : “A link Between Lusi and the volcanic complex: insights from gas geochemistry”

April 2011. Mazzini, A., Etiope, G., Svensen, H., 2011. Was the Lusi eruption triggered by volcanic intrusions? New insights from gas geochemistry. European Geological Union, 03–08 April, Vienna, Austria

November 2009.  Invited panelist at the screening of “MUD MAX”, the new documentary on Lusi Mud Volcano e mud volcanism in Java. 13 November, Scottsdale, Phoenix, Azizona, USA. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sd8ZdQ2MPAQ

September 2009.  Editor of: Special Issue on MPG: Mazzini, A., 2009. Mud volcanism: Processes and implications. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 26(9). (DOWNLOAD)

September 2009. New manuscripts on mud volcanism:

Mazzini, A., 2009. Mud volcanism: Processes and implications. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 26(9): 1677-1680. DOWNLOAD

Mazzini, A., Nermoen, A., Krotkiewski, M., Podladchikov, Y., Planke, S. and Svensen, H., 2009a. Strike-slip faulting as a trigger mechanism for overpressure release through piercement structures. Implications for the Lusi mud volcano, Indonesia. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 26(9): 1751-1765. DOWNLOAD

Papers LUSI in Journals: Andriano Mazzini

EDISI KHUSUS MPG 2017

  1. Fallahi, M., Obermann, A., Lupi, A., Karyono, K., and Mazzini, A., 2017, The Lusi eruption plumbing system revealed by ambient noise tomography: journal of Geophysical Research, v. DOI: 10.1002/2017JB014592. (READ MORE)
  2. Moscariello, A., Do Couto, D., Mondino, F., Booth, J., Lupi, M., and Mazzini, A., 2017, Genesis and evolution of the Watukosek fault system in the Lusi area: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.09.032. Marine & Petroleum Geology, v.
  3. Di Felice, F., Mazzini, A., Romeo, G., and Di Stefano, G., 2017, Drone high resolution infrared imaging of the Lusi mud eruption: Marine & Petroleum Geology, v. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.10.025.
  4. Inguaggiato, S., Mazzini, A., Vita, F., and Sciarra, A., 2017, The Arjuno-Welirang Volcanic Complex and the connected Lusi system: geochemical evidences: Marine & Petroleum Geology, v. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.10.015.
  5. Sciarra, A., Mazzini, A., Inguaggiato, S., Vita, F., Lupi, A., and Hadi, S., 2017, Radon and carbon gas anomalies along the Watukosek fault system and Lusi mud eruption, Indonesia: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.09.031. Marine & Petroleum Geology, v.
  6. Mazzini, A., Scholz, F., Svensen, C., Hensen, C., and Hadi, S., 2017, The geochemistry and origin of the hydrothermal water erupted at Lusi, Indonesia: Marine & Petroleum Geology, v. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.06.018.
  7. Di Stefano, G., Romeo, G., Mazzini, A., Iarocci, A., Hadi, S., and Pelphrey, S., 2017, The Lusi drone: A multidisciplinary tool to access extreme environments: Marine and Petroleum Geology, v. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.07.006.
  8. Svensen, H., Iyer, K., Schmid, D., and Mazzini, A., 2017, Modelling of gas generation following emplacement of an igneous sill below Lusi, east Java, Indonesia: Marine & Petroleum Geology, v. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.07.007.
  9. Mauri, G., Husein, A., Mazzini, A., Karyono, K., Obermann, A., Bertrand, G. L., M., Prasetyo, H., Hadi, S., and Miller, S. A., 2017, Constraints on density changes in the funnel-shaped caldera inferred from gravity monitoring of the Lusi mud eruption: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.06.030. Marine and Petroleum Geology journal, v.
  10. Mauri, G., Husein, A., Mazzini, A., Irawan, D., Sohrabi, R., Hadi, S., Prasetyo, H., and Miller, S. A., 2017, Insights on the structure of Lusi mud edifice from land gravity data: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.05.041. Marine and Petroleum Geology, v.
  11. Miller, S. A., and Mazzini, A., 2017, More than ten years of Lusi: A review of facts, coincidences, and past and future studies: Marine and Petroleum Geology, v. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.06.019.
  12. Collignon, M., Schmid, D. W., Galerne, C., Lupi, M., and Mazzini, A., 2017, Modelling fluid flow in clastic eruptions: Application to the Lusi mud eruption: Marine and Petroleum Geology, v. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.08.011.
  13. Sohrabi, R., Jansen, G., Malvoisin, B., Mazzini, A., and Miller, S. A., 2017, Numerical modeling of the Lusi hydrothermal system: Initial results and future challenges: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.08.012. Marine and Petroleum Geology, v.
  14. Panzera, F., D’Amico, S., Lupi, M., Mauri, G., Karyono, K., and Mazzini, A., 2017, Lusi hydrothermal structure inferred through ambient vibration measurements: Marine and Petroleum Geology, v. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.06.017.
  15. Obermann, A., Karyono, K., Diehl, T., Lupi, A., and Mazzini, A., 2017, Seismicity at Lusi and the adjacent volcanic complex, Java, Indonesia: Marine & Petroleum Geology, v. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.07.033.

PAPER PUBLIKASI PADA BEBERAPA JURNAL ILMIAH

  1. Mazzini, A., and Etiope, G., 2017, Mud volcanism: An updated review: Earth-Science Reviews, v. 168, p. 81–112. 
  2. Karyono, K., Obermann, A., Lupi, M., Masturyono, M., Hadi, S., Syafri, I., Abdurrokhim, A., and Mazzini, A., 2017, Lusi, a clastic-dominated geysering system in Indonesia recently explored by surface and subsurface observations: Terra Nova, v. 29, p. 13-19 DOWNLOAD
  3. Mazzini, A., Etiope, G., and Svensen, H., 2012, A new hydrothermal scenario for the 2006 Lusi eruption, Indonesia. Insights from gas geochemistry: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 317-318, no. 0, p. 305-318.DOWNLOAD
  4. Mazzini, A., Svensen, H., Etiope, G., Onderdonk, N., Banks, D., 2011. Fluid origin, gas fluxes and plumbing system in the sediment-hosted Salton Sea Geothermal System (California, USA). Journal of volcanology and geothermal research 205, 67-83. DOWNLOAD
  5. Mazzini, A., 2009. Mud volcanism: Processes and implications. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 26(9): 1677-1680. DOWNLOAD
  6. Mazzini, A., Nermoen, A., Krotkiewski, M., Podladchikov, Y., Planke, S. and Svensen, H., 2009a. Strike-slip faulting as a trigger mechanism for overpressure release through piercement structures. Implications for the Lusi mud volcano, Indonesia. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 26(9): 1751-1765. DOWNLOAD

 

Tinggalkan komentar